In contrast, pay equality addresses the broader issue of whether men and women earn the same on average across an organisation. It looks beyond a job-to-job comparison. Instead, it aims for the average salaries (mean or median) of all female and male employees to be equal, irrespective of their roles within the company.
Let’s look at an example:
Imagine a technology company where both John and Sarah are software engineering managers with similar levels of experience and responsibility.
Pay equity is achieved if John and Sarah receive the same salary for their similar roles, reflecting equal pay for equal work regardless of their gender, age, race, or other characteristics.
Pay equality, on the other hand, focuses on the average earnings of all female employees being equal to the average earnings of all male employees across the entire company. It addresses the overall balance of earnings between genders within the entire organisation, highlighting the systemic issues that influence these outcomes.
What does the unadjusted Ravio data tell us?
If John and Sarah are both managers in the UK, Sarah would earn 17% less than John. This disparity varies across different job levels within the same company:
- At the Support level, the gender pay gap is non-existent, with women earning the same as men. Women are also better represented at this level, comprising of 53% of the workforce.
- At the Professional level, the gap widens considerably, with women earning 25% less than their male counterparts and representing 39% of the professionals.
- At the Manager level, where John and Sarah are positioned, women like Sarah face a 17% pay gap and make up 36% of their tier.
- Interestingly, at the Executive level, there is no gender pay gap. Both genders earn the same, but women represent only 22% of executive roles, indicating a significant underrepresentation at the highest levels of the organisation.